What does it mean to be "saved"?
It should be clear by now, James is not speaking of
getting saved from hell. So why have so many interpreted
the word "saved" in James chapter 2 as salvation from
hell? When a word or phrase has more than one possible
application or meaning, the interpretation by the hearer is
influenced by the context as perceived by the hearer.
Comedians have long exploited the phenomena of double
meanings, or the "double entendre," wherein the audience is
aware of two separate perceptions of two separate speakers.
Abbot and Castello's "Who's On First" is a wonderful
example of such humor.
Similarly, there is an old joke which works better when
spoken aloud. The questioner begins:
"Say ten" ten times."
The participant, knowing it is a joke, and typically
sensing a hidden trap, responds by saying, "ten ten times."
Eventually, however, the participant is persuaded that the
trap will come later, and coxed into saying, "ten, ten, ten, ten,
ten, ten, ten, ten, ten, ten."
Next, the questioner asks, "What are aluminum cans
made out of." In American vernacular, however, cans for
canning food and drink have commonly been called have
been called "tin cans" regardless of whether they are made
from tin, aluminum, steel, mixed alloys, or any other
material.
Because this expression is so common throughout
American vernacular, the participant jumps to the conclusion
that the repetition of the word "ten" was done to get him to
mispronounce the word "tin." Believing he has discovered
the trap, and carefully enunciates the word, "TIN," with clear
and careful elocution.
The joke, of course, is that aluminum cans are not made
of tin, they are made of aluminum! The very answer was in
the question itself. But by orienting the attention of the
listener to something irrelevant, specifically, the repetitive
pronunciation of the word "ten," the listener is focused on the
wrong thing when trying to avoid the hidden trap of the joke,
and thereby walks straight into the trap.
The above joke illustrates a well recognized principle of
human psychology. One interprets an event or statement
according to the context perceived by the hearer. If the
context is perceived accurately, the interpretation of an event
or statement has a good chance of being accurate. However,
if one's contextual predisposition is biased, errant, or
otherwise inconsistent with the proper meaning of a word or
phrase, the conclusion will usually be wrong, and sometimes
even funny. Such as concluding that aluminum cans are
made out of tin, or that "Who" is the name of a man playing
first base.
In evangelical Christianity, those who have been saved
by the blood of Jesus Christ have that salvation as the center
of their mind. And well they should. We shall, throughout
eternity, worship the lamb that was slain from the foundation
of the world, paying, by that death, the penalty due for the
sins of the whole world. And that salvation is by faith alone
in Jesus Christ alone. So central is the "faith alone," doctrine
to Christianity, the apostle Paul wrote a letter to the church of
Galatia warning them that, if someone comes to Christ while
believing that circumcision is also necessary for salvation,
they are not trusting in Christ alone, and are not even
demonstrating a saving faith.
Against this great truth, however, there is a profound
limitation of faith. Although faith in Christ saves one from
eternal hell, that is probably the only circumstance from
which faith will save one! Salvation or deliverance from
nearly all other circumstances, trials and perils require works.
If one parachutes out of an airplane, faith will not save them.
They must pull the rip cord. This is a work. If one is being
hounded by bill collectors, faith will not save them. To be
delivered from the harassment of the bill collectors, one must pay his bills. This is a work. If one is in the habit of
drinking to excess and then driving a motor vehicle, faith in
Jesus will not save them from a serious, and possibly fatal
accident. They must stop drinking and driving. This is a
work. If one has an exam in algebra, faith in Jesus will not
help make a good grade. They must study.
The truth is, eternal salvation is probably the only form of
salvation that is based on faith alone. Virtually every other
circumstance or danger on this earth requires works to be
saved!
This is not simply common sense. It is true throughout
Scripture. The words "saved" and "salvation" are far more
frequently used within Scripture with respect to earthly
dangers that with respect to hell. For example, in
Deuteronomy 22 we read:
25. But if a man find a betrothed damsel in the field,
and the man force her, and lie with her: then the man
only that lay with her shall die:
26. But unto the damsel thou shalt do nothing;
There is in the damsel no sin worthy of death: for
as when a man riseth against his neighbour, and slayeth him, even so is this matter:
27. For he found her in the field, and the betrothed
damsel cried, and there was none to save her.
Or again, in Matthew 8 we read:
24. And, behold, there arose a great tempest in the
sea, insomuch that the ship was covered with the
waves: but he was asleep.
25. And his disciples came to him, and awoke him,
saying, Lord, save us: we perish.
A "hermeneutic" is a presupposition, or set of presuppositions, (both substantive and methodological),
that that are used to interpret a passage. In any passage of
Scripture, the object from which a person is being saved must
Be drawn from the context, not imposed on the context. It
should be transparently obvious to even the most
unintelligent reader that neither of the above passages in
Deuteronomy and Matthew have anything to do with getting
saved from hell, and that to impose such a hermeneutic on
either of these passages is plainly idiotic.
A young maiden is saved from an assailant when a
man of strength and valor happens on the attack and kills
the assailant, or drives him away. One is saved from a storm
on the sea by bailing water out of the boat as quickly as
possible, and making for shore as quickly as possible. It
would be plainly idiotic to interpret the word "save" in
either of the above passages as being directed at salvation
from the eternal judgment of God.
Unfortunately, the very hermeneutic which was so
plainly idiotic in the above referenced passages of
Deuteronomy and Matthew is typically imposed upon the
meaning of the word "save" in the second chapter of
James. Without any supporting context, those of simple
minds and limited understanding of interpreting according to
a context rush forward to interpret the word "save" in James
as referring to eternal salvation.
When James speaks of being saved by works, he is not
speaking about eternal salvation before the throne of God.
He is talking about salvation from the trials and hardships
of unemployment, homelessness and poverty.
|
Chapter 7: What Does it Mean to Be "Saved?" |
|
|